Why Chronic Lyme is based on ideology, not science
French experts separate facts from fiction
Because patients deserve better
French experts separate facts from fiction
Experts: “Chronic Lyme disease” is not based on any evidence.
The loophole employed by predatory Lyme labs and Theranos
Three questions to ask
Worth watching
Antibody testing is more useful
Chronic Lyme pseudoscience groups wrongly blame bartonella
Toxic snake oil used as a cure-all
Beware of fake experts trying to legitimize themselves
Many ways to get a false positive diagnosis
We want an explanation for our problems
31 doctors and scientists deconstruct the social phenomenon
The true diagnoses were lupus, cancer, and heart infection.
With IgeneX, healthy patients tested falsely positive for Lyme
More affirmation of the scientific consensus
Unnecessary Lyme anxiety
Useful, evidence-based information on Lyme disease.
But testimonials mislead
Nous avons le devoir de contribuer à rétablir la vérité
Reprinted from Médecine et Maladies Infectieuses, 2019 Authors Dr. Marc Gentilini, Infectious and Tropical Diseases, parasitology, public health, National Academy of Medicine, Paris, France Dr. François Bricaire, Infectious and Tropical Diseases, internal medicine, National Academy of Medicine, Paris, France Français: … Continued